Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Langfitt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 1,603 hits . Analysis detected 10,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,698 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (918 of 6,628 authors). This Frank Langfitt is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Frank Langfitt
Author details
Total words: 4,698
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 24.5% 24.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.2% 27.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 34.1% 34.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.2% 7.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.3% 11.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.1% 5.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 34.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 24.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst