Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francis Tang results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,316 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (640 of 6,628 authors). This Francis Tang is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Francis Tang
Author details
Total words: 1,316
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 15.2% 15.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.7% 15.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.4% 8.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.5% 9.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.9% 21.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.7% 5.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst