Author summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francis Fukuyama results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,179 hits . Analysis detected 7,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,254 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,612 of 6,628 authors). This Francis Fukuyama is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Francis Fukuyama
Author details
Total words: 6,254
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.9% 18.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst