Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fla. Sen. Shevrin Jones results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 1,321 hits. Analysis detected 7,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Fla. Sen. Shevrin Jones is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fla. Sen. Shevrin Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Fla. Sen. Shevrin Jones (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.7%28.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 38.8%38.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 14.9%14.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.1%17.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 7.5%7.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Author 38.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.1%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos