Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiona Sturges results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,952 hits. Analysis detected 7,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,911 of 6,628 authors). This Fiona Sturges is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Fiona Sturges
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
57%Fiona Sturges (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,668
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate