Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feven Gerezgiher results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 1,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 993 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (448 of 6,628 authors). This Feven Gerezgiher is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Feven Gerezgiher
Author details
Total words: 993
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.3% percentile 8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles993 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 22.4% 22.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 43.5% 43.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 30.9% 30.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 43.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 30.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Loss Aversion: Author 22.4%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst