Author summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fabiola Zerpa results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,286 of 6,189 authors). This Fabiola Zerpa is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Fabiola Zerpa
Author details
Total words: 1,160
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst