Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eyder Peralta results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 573 hits . Analysis detected 1,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,215 of 6,357 authors). This Eyder Peralta is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Eyder Peralta
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.8% 23.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst