Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These executive producer Rachel Humphreys results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 701 faulty-reasoning hits from 420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (111 of 6,222 authors). This executive producer Rachel Humphreys is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
executive producer Rachel Humphreys
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%executive producer Rachel Humphreys (selected)17%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 420
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles420 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 43.3%43.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.2%26.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 19.8%19.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 32.9%32.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 14.8%14.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 43.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 32.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 19.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate