Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Hynes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 457 hits . Analysis detected 2,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,835 of 6,244 authors). This Erin Hynes is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Erin Hynes
Author details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst