Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Carson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 5,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,010 of 6,244 authors). This Erin Carson is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Erin Carson
Author details
Total words: 7,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst