Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enza Uda results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 4,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,736 of 6,628 authors). This Enza Uda is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Enza Uda
Author details
Total words: 6,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst