Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emma Marsden results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 317 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Emma Marsden is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emma Marsden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Emma Marsden (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,050
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos