Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Hung results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Special Pleading, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,204 of 6,135 authors). This Emily Hung is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Emily Hung
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
32%Emily Hung (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos