Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Bright results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 198 hits . Analysis detected 1,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 669 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of â 94% (408 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Bright is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Emily Bright
Author details
Total words: 669
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.9% percentile 9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles669 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Author 26.2% 26.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 29.6% 29.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.7% 19.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 16.7% 16.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.5% 18.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 29.6%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 26.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 11.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Primacy Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst