Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elliot Keck results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 1,156 hits . Analysis detected 6,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (636 of 6,228 authors). This Elliot Keck is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Elliot Keck
Author details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 44.6% 44.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 25.7% 25.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.7% 15.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.1% 9.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 44.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 25.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 14.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst