Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ellie Fivas results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 4,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Ellie Fivas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ellie Fivas
Author details
Total words: 5,742
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst