Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Grace Matthew results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (986 of 6,316 authors). This Elizabeth Grace Matthew is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Grace Matthew
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠85%Elizabeth Grace Matthew (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,220
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.0%16.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 11.8%11.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.4%6.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos