Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elissa Nadworny results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 892 hits . Analysis detected 5,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,421 of 6,628 authors). This Elissa Nadworny is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Elissa Nadworny
Author details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst