Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 1,853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Davis-Diver results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,106 hits . Analysis detected 5,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,559 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,194 of 6,628 authors). This Eleanor Davis-Diver is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Eleanor Davis-Diver
Author details
Total words: 5,559
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst