Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Cha results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 465 hits . Analysis detected 4,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,846 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,283 of 6,341 authors). This Elaine Cha is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Elaine Cha
Author details
Total words: 3,846
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst