Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Eileen Reslen results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 843 hits . Analysis detected 7,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Eileen Reslen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Eileen Reslen
Author details
Total words: 5,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 14.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst