Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edward Helmore results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 745 hits . Analysis detected 8,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,556 of 6,628 authors). This Edward Helmore is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Edward Helmore
Author details
Total words: 9,404
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst