Author summary
71%1 analyzed article/video458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ED WHITE — Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,374 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,929 of 6,263 authors). This ED WHITE — Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
ED WHITE — Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%ED WHITE — Associated Press (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,374
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos