Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Moriarty results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 3,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (2,501 of 6,629 authors). This Dylan Moriarty is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Dylan Moriarty
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠63%Dylan Moriarty (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos