Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doris Lam results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 3,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,758 of 6,628 authors). This Doris Lam is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Doris Lam
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
29%Doris Lam (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,984
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos