Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diba Mohtasham results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 2,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (565 of 6,628 authors). This Diba Mohtasham is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Diba Mohtasham
Author details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.5% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 29.6% 29.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 29.6%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst