Author summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video1,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diane Carman results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 739 hits. Analysis detected 5,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,189 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (1,571 of 6,316 authors). This Diane Carman is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Diane Carman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠76%Diane Carman (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,189
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.2%23.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 20.7%20.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.3%5.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos