Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Roy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 361 hits . Analysis detected 2,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,815 of 6,318 authors). This Diana Roy is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Diana Roy
Author details
Total words: 6,680
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst