Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Diana Berg results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 2,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Diana Berg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Diana Berg
Author details
Total words: 3,708
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst