Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deepa Seetharaman results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque , Appeal to Emotion , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 268 hits . Analysis detected 2,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,949 of 6,628 authors). This Deepa Seetharaman is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Deepa Seetharaman
Author details
Total words: 3,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst