Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deena Shinn results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 2,570 hits . Analysis detected 10,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,400 of 6,529 authors). This Deena Shinn is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Deena Shinn
Author details
Total words: 18,380
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst