Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David DiMolfetta results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,431 of 6,628 authors). This David DiMolfetta is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. David DiMolfetta
Author details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.4% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst