Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David DeMay results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 5,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,734 of 6,244 authors). This David DeMay is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. David DeMay
Author details
Total words: 4,676
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst