Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Schilling results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 835 hits. Analysis detected 4,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,637 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (632 of 6,228 authors). This Dave Schilling is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Dave Schilling
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Dave Schilling (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,637
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.9% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.3%28.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 31.7%31.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.7%13.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.8%6.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 31.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos