Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Palumbo results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 990 hits . Analysis detected 9,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,933 of 6,359 authors). This Danny Palumbo is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Danny Palumbo
Author details
Total words: 8,072
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst