Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Noyes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 1,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,155 of 6,316 authors). This Danielle Noyes is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Danielle Noyes
Author details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst