Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dana Stevens results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 1,717 hits . Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Dana Stevens is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dana Stevens
Author details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.9% 28.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.5% 10.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst