Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dana Munro results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 911 hits. Analysis detected 1,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Dana Munro is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dana Munro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Dana Munro (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 21.7%21.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 21.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos