Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Cronin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 449 hits . Analysis detected 3,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,851 of 6,628 authors). This Dana Cronin is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Dana Cronin
Author details
Total words: 4,242
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst