Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Phiffer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 635 hits . Analysis detected 3,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,841 of 6,628 authors). This Dan Phiffer is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Dan Phiffer
Author details
Total words: 7,444
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst