Author summary
â 41% 1 analyzed article/video 1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Courtney Vaughn results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 2,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 35% (4,342 of 6,628 authors). This Courtney Vaughn is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Courtney Vaughn
Author details
Total words: 4,383
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst