Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos8,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cory Turner results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 3,089 hits. Analysis detected 20,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,167 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (6,072 of 6,382 authors). This Cory Turner is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Cory Turner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
5%Cory Turner (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 35,167
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate