Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Claudia Lorena Silva results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 340 hits . Analysis detected 2,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,382 authors). This Claudia Lorena Silva is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Claudia Lorena Silva
Author details
Total words: 5,055
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst