Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chuck D results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Chuck D is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chuck D
Author details
Total words: 2,250
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst