Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Goffard results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 4,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,939 of 6,628 authors). This Christopher Goffard is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Christopher Goffard
Author details
Total words: 6,380
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst