Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Chantrill results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 985 hits. Analysis detected 7,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (816 of 6,261 authors). This Christopher Chantrill is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Christopher Chantrill
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠87%Christopher Chantrill (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 26.8%26.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.1%19.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 15.8%15.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.9%10.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 28.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 26.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 14.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos