Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chris Tomlinson results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 376 hits . Analysis detected 3,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Chris Tomlinson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chris Tomlinson
Author details
Total words: 3,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst