Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chris Tomlinson results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 3,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Chris Tomlinson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chris Tomlinson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Chris Tomlinson (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,400
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos