Author summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Palmer results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 498 hits. Analysis detected 1,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,727 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,455 of 6,359 authors). This Chris Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Chris Palmer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠78%Chris Palmer (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,727
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos