Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Hampton results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 1,845 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,984 of 6,628 authors). This Chris Hampton is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Chris Hampton
Author details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst